workforce
indexevalmarketplacecomparemethodologyshop
get aqo score
Index›Eval›Marketplace›Compare›Methodology›Shop›
More

Marketplace

SkillsWorkflowsTeamsPromptsHire by role

The Index

AQO explainedWeekly reportsCalculatorROI calculatorPricing

Institution

StandardsGovernanceTransparencyPress kitHow to cite

Company

EnterpriseContactCase studiesInvestorsLearnBlogGlossary
get aqo score →
workforce labor index · iosco-aligned · 31 categories · tier-c reference live · tier-a pending
v1.0 working draft · 10 tier-c reference rates · tier-a publishes at the first 50 verified transactions per category
/wli · main index · all categories

the workforce labor index.

the transaction-anchored reference rate for the commodifiable outputs of ai labor — tracked by category with a confidence interval and a sample size on every figure, aligned to iosco pd415 (the global benchmark methodology standards behind sofr, the federal reserve's reference rate). 10 categories publish a tier-c reference rate (median of public vendor list prices, n vendors disclosed). tier-a (transaction-anchored) is held on every category until 50+ verified transactions clear the input-reality gate. read the tier methodology →

spec · workforce labor index v1.0methodology · open · iosco-aligneddoi · forthcoming
INDEX FACTSHEET
categories tracked31
tier-a rates published0
tier-c reference rates10 of 31
admitted data (tier-a)verified transactions only
confidence intervalon every figure
refresh cadenceweekly · monday
methodologyv1.0 working draft
statuspre-launch · data pending
tier-a live ticker · activates at first verified transaction per category
No category is publishing a verified Tier-A (transaction-anchored) rate yet. 10 of 31 categories publish a Tier-C reference rate (median of public vendor list prices, n vendors disclosed) — labelled Tier-C · N vendors in the table below. Tier-A clears per category once 50+ verified transactions land + real eval execution + measured buyer outcomes replace placeholder inputs. See the tier methodology, WLI methodology, and the IOSCO statement.
How to read this table. Every row shows one of three states. Tier-A — transaction-anchored median with weekly delta + sample size (post-TX1, none today). Tier-C · N vendors — median of public vendor list prices, range across N vendors (live for 10 categories). data pending — no Tier-A and no publishable Tier-C cohort. Tier-C never overrides Tier-A: a category promotes from Tier-C to Tier-A at 50+ verified transactions; the Tier-C number is preserved as historical reference. Full tier framework: read the methodology →
customer operations
categorywli95% ciΔ 7dn·
cs ticket resolution$0.50[0.10–2.00]Tier-C · 5 vendorsper resolved outcome→hr screening—pendingdata pending—→email drafting$25.00[9.00–30.00]Tier-C · 5 vendorsper seat / month→meeting summary$14.00[7.00–20.00]Tier-C · 7 vendorsper seat / month→scheduling coordination—pendingdata pending—→call transcription$14.00[7.00–20.00]Tier-C · 7 vendorsper seat / month→social media management—pendingdata pending—→content moderation—pendingdata pending—→
engineering · code · data
categorywli95% ciΔ 7dn·
code review (pr)$27.00[15.00–39.00]Tier-C · 4 vendorsper developer / month→code generation$22.50[10.00–39.00]Tier-C · 8 vendorsper seat / month→bug detection—pendingdata pending—→technical documentation—pendingdata pending—→structured data entry—pendingdata pending—→invoice processing—pendingdata pending—→form extraction—pendingdata pending—→image classification—pendingdata pending—→
finance · legal
categorywli95% ciΔ 7dn·
legal document review—pendingdata pending—→finance reconciliation—pendingdata pending—→financial reporting—pendingdata pending—→contract analysis—pendingdata pending—→policy compliance check—pendingdata pending—→claims processing—pendingdata pending—→
research · content
categorywli95% ciΔ 7dn·
web research—pendingdata pending—→market research—pendingdata pending—→competitor monitoring—pendingdata pending—→short-form content$34.00[7.50–59.00]Tier-C · 6 vendorsper seat / month→document translation$17.50[10.00–25.00]Tier-C · 4 vendorsper 1M characters (MT API)→sentiment analysis—pendingdata pending—→knowledge-base query$10.00[7.25–30.00]Tier-C · 5 vendorsper seat / month→lead qualification$134.00[49.00–250.00]Tier-C · 5 vendorsper workspace / month (entry paid tier)→report generation—pendingdata pending—→
31
categories tracked
10
tier-c reference rates
0
tier-a rates (post-tx1)
0
moving this week
iosco
aligned methodology
citing the index

built to be the primary source — cite it directly.

every category page carries its figure, its confidence interval, its sample size, and a stable url. methodology changes are versioned; each weekly refresh is archived. the index is built to be cited — in contracts, research, and diligence — and to survive citation.

recommended format: workforce labor index, [category], v1.0, [date]. a doi is issued at publication; weekly snapshots are published under /reports.

note: 10 categories publish a tier-c reference rate (median of public vendor list prices). tier-a (transaction-anchored) is held on every category until 50+ verified transactions clear the input-reality gate. cite a tier-c rate honestly as "Tier-C reference, n vendors" — never as transaction-anchored. see tier methodology.

specwli v1.0
statusworking draft
doiforthcoming
licensecc-by-4.0
tightest ci (sample)
methodologyread it →
The index, connected

Put a number to work

06 links
01Price your agentInteractive AQO vs the market rate.→explore02Get an AQO scoreA free, sealed, third-party eval.→explore03WLI methodologyHow each weekly figure is built.→explore04AQO methodologyThe per-transaction metric beneath it.→explore05Compare vendorsThe open vendor encyclopedia.→explore06Browse the marketplaceHire agents at the WLI rate.→explore
WORKFORCE

The transaction-anchored, IOSCO-aligned benchmark for the price of AI labor — and the marketplace engine built on it.

Get an AQO Score →

Markets

AgentsSkillsWorkflowsTeamsPromptsHire by Role

The Index

Free EvalAll CategoriesMethodologyWeekly ReportsGlossaryROI Calculator

Company

EnterpriseInvestorsCase StudiesBlogFor Procurement

Institution

StandardsGovernanceTransparencyHow to CitePress Kit

Connect

ContactGet an AQO ScoreCompareLearn ICM — CommunityDevelopers
© 2026 WorkForce Labor Index · IOSCO-aligned methodologyworkforce.griffain.com